Hemant B.Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

skc 33-CRPILL-29-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (STAMP) NO. 29 OF 2016 Mr. Hemant B. Patil ..

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents Mr. R. N. Kachave for Petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Shinde with Mr. K. V. Saste for Respondents.

CORAM:

V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ.

DATE :

05 AUGUST 2016 P.C.:

1] This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs: "(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to respondent No. 1 to 3 under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the entire records on the representation made by the petitioner as an Exhibit - A, in respect of various protest, breach of peace, violation of law and order made by various MLAs and MLCs in the premises of Vidhan Bhavan and prohibited areas like Court, Mantralaya, etc. and to file a detailed Report within a specified period.

(b) This Hon'ble Court may kindly pass and order of direction to respondent No. 1 to 3 for inquiry and investigation and legal action against culprits MLAs and MLCs in the premises of Vidhan Bhavan and prohibited areas like Courts in

skc 33-CRPILL-29-16.doc various incidences.

(c) Interim and ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer (b) above; (d) For cost of the petition;

(e) For such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require, be passed.: 2] We are afraid that we will not be in a position to consider or grant reliefs claimed by the petitioner in the petition while exercising our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Reserving the right of the petitioner to seek the reliefs claimed by him before the alternate efficacious forum, petition is disposed of. (M. S. SONAK, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.) chandka