Nanu Balu Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

38.ba1454.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1454 OF 2016 Nanu Balu Patil.

... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Shivraj R. Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for the State.

CORAM:

SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J.

DATE : JANUARY 4, 2017.

P.C.

Learned APP at the outset submits that in the present case, the trial is in progress. The substantive evidence of the investigating officer was to be recorded today. However, he is present before this Court to give instructions to the learned APP in the present matter and therefore, his evidence could not be recorded. Taking into consideration the fact that the evidence has been recorded and the trial is in progress, it would not be Talwalkar 1/2

38.ba1454.16 appropriate for this Court to consider the application seeking enlargement on bail. Hence, the application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.) Talwalkar 2/2