Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai, Mumbai v. Darshansing Lakhansingh Bhatia

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. NO. 13417 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1482 OF 2005 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- None present CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 17/07/2023 Perused.

As per office note, notice issued to Sole Respondent is returned unserved with Bailiff's remark, "Not found.". As per Registrar (Judl. II) Court's Order dt.

12/01/2023, RPAD Notice issued to Sole Respondent returned unserved with remark, "Gone out hence pasted on door".

The learned Advocate for Applicant is not aware about new address. Thus, only option left is to serve the Sole Respondent by way of substituted service.

The Learned Advocate has taken out present Interim Application to serve Sole Respondent by way of substituted service. As per Office Note, Address of Sole Respondent mentioned in the above notice is same as mentioned in Interim Application and in memo of First Appeal as well as in Judgment of the Lower Court.

In turn, Interim Application No.

13417 of 2023 (for substituted service) is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), returnable by 08 weeks.

Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)