Vinayak Anand Dhargalkar v. State Of Maharashtra

1/2 906 908 ABA 1992 1994-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1922 OF 2022 Vinayak Anand Dhargalkar ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1994 OF 2022 Bechu Gurav Gupta ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...

Mr.Dilip Shukla with Priya Pandey and D.K. Shukla for the applicants.

Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP for the State.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 22nd JULY, 2022 P.C:- The two applicants are arraigned as accused in C.R.No. 556/2022 registered with Amboli police station, invoking Sections 354, 509, 507, 504 r/w Section 34 IPC. Barring the offence punishable u/s.354, all the other offences are bailable.

Tilak

2/2 906 908 ABA 1992 1994-22.doc Looking to the accusations faced by the applicants, in the backdrop of the narration given by the complainant, let the Investigating Officer serve a notice u/s.41A of Cr.P.C upon the applicants, since the offence u/s.354 is punishable with the maximum imprisonment for five years.

The applicants shall respond to the said notice and report to the Investigating Officer as directed. Upon securing their presence, the Investigating Officer shall follow the procedure prescribed u/s.41A. In case the Investigating Officer comes to a conclusion that he require the custodial interrogation, he shall give 48 hours notice to the applicant, in the two applications.

Applications are disposed off.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Tilak