Sachin Purushottam Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2021.10.04 16:10:44 +0530 4-ba.3111.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3111 OF 2021 Sachin Purushottam Kamble ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. B. K. Barve a/w Mr. Sandeep Barve, Ms. Archana Lad, Ms. Sheetal Tanpure, Mr. Santosh Wagh, Mr. Vijay Hamale, and Ms. Janhavi Barve i/b B. K. Barve & Co., for the Applicant.

Mr. H. J. Dedhia, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1- State. Mr. Rajesh A. Tekale, for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER 2021 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) P.C. :

1.

Learned APP states that during the pendency of this application, charge-sheet has been filed as against the applicant. 2.

In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application seeking regular bail, after filing of the charge-sheet. N. S. Chitnis 1/2

4-ba.3111.2021.doc 3.

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

4.

If an application for regular bail, after filing of the charge sheet is filed, the same shall be considered on its own merits, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of the aforesaid application. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

N. S. Chitnis 2/2