Mr. Iliyas Hanif Qureshi v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

79-CP-376-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 376 OF 2018 Iliyas H. Qureshi ... Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra and ors.

... Respondents ---------------- Mr. U. P. Warunjikar for the Petitioner.

Ms K.N. Solunke, AGP for the Respondent - State. Mr. R.M. Momin for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

----------------

CORAM

:

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

JANUARY 27, 2020.

P.C.

1] Learned advocate appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 states that after framing a Scheme, elections of Wakf Board have already been held.

2] Counsel for the petitioner does not have any specifc instructions on these developments.

3] As statement is being made by responsible ofcer, we accept it. However, there is some delay.

Dinesh Sherla 1/2

79-CP-376-18.doc 4] In the present situation, on account of delay, we are not inclined to intervene in contempt jurisdiction. Keeping all other rights and contentions of the petitioner open, we dispose of present contempt petition.

(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Dinesh Sherla 2/2