Rohan Kanhaiya Naidu v. State Of Maharashtra

(15)aba-2013-2022.doc rkmore

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2013 OF 2022 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.13810 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2013 OF 2022 Rohan Kanhaiya Naidu ] ..

Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra ] ..

Respondent Mr.Affin Pathan a/w Rafiq Gani for the Applicant. Mr.Amey Deshpande, for the Intervenor.

Smt.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the State.

PI D.K. Gund, Bangarnagar Police Station present. CORAM :

BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE :

17TH AUGUST, 2022.

P.C.

1] The learned APP states that notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. was served upon the Applicant on 05.07.2022. 2] The learned counsel for the Applicant states that pursuant to the said notice, the Applicant has reported to the Police Station and his statement is recorded.

The aforesaid statement is denied by the learned APP. 1/2

(15)aba-2013-2022.doc 3] In any case, the Applicant is issued with notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. and since the subject CR invoke Sections 406, 408 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, let the Applicant report to the Investigating Officer on 19.08.2022 and render his co-operation. 4] The Investigating Officer shall follow the procedure prescribed under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. and if he is desirous to arrest the Applicant, he shall record reasons in writing and serve notice to that effect upon the Applicant.

5] With the above directions, application is disposed off. In the wake of above, Interim application is also disposed off. [BHARATI DANGRE, J] 2/2