Girish Kantilal Nahar v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 32-BA 1828-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1828 OF 2019 Girish Kantilal Nahar ] ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent Mr. Mahesh Joshi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Rajan Salvi, APP for State/Respondent.

PSI S.B. More attached to Camp Police Station, Malegaon, District Nashik present.

CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE :- 18 th JULY, 2019.

P. C. :- 1.

After arguing for some time, when I expressed my disinclination to grant any relief, Ld. Counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application. Permission is granted. The application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly. 2.

However, Ld. Counsel for the applicant also submits that the nature of allegations show that there is a possibility that the prosecutrix was having love affair with the applicant and therefore the applicant should not suffer indefeasible without trial in custody. His Purti Parab

2 32-BA 1828-19.doc statement has some force. Therefore, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of one year.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Purti Parab