Satishkumar G. Varma v. Ruchit Machines And ORS

8-ALP-338-2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.338 OF 2015 SATISHKUMAR G. VARMA )...APPLICANT V/s.

RUCHIT MACHINES AND OTHERS )...RESPONDENTS Shri Chandan Ahani with Shri Phiroz Merchant i/b. Apex Law Partners, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri Pravinkumar P. More, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Shri V.B.KondeDeshmukh, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.

DATE :

29th FEBRUARY 2016.

P.C. :

Heard.

Leave granted, but only with respect to respondent nos.1 and 2. So far as respondent no.3 is concerned, leave to appeal is refused.

avk 1/2

8-ALP-338-2015.doc The application for leave to appeal be treated as 'Memo of Appeal' and be numbered accordingly. Necessary amendment be carried out within a week. The appeal is admitted.

Issue notice to the respondents.

Respondent no.2 shall execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- for himself, and also, for and on behalf of respondent no.1, before the trial court, within a period of four weeks from the service of notice upon him.

Hearing of the appeal is ordered to be expedited. Liberty to either of the parties to move the court for getting a date for final hearing of the appeal fixed, after the receipt of record and proceedings and paper book.

(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) avk 2/2