Sohail Ahmed Nihal Ahmed And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Govt. Pleader And ORS.

523 wp8391-17 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8391 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Manoj Harit i/b M/s.Manoj Harit and Co. for the Petitioner Mr.S.H.Kenkal, A.G.P. for the respondent no.1 Mr.N.R.Bubna for the respondent nos.2 and 3 Mr.M.N.Sandhyanshiv for the respondent nos.4 and CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : JULY 31, 2017 P.C.:

Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the petitioner, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

By this Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 25.4.2017 passed by learned SubDivisional Officer in RTS Appeal No.35 of 2016 and order dated 29.6.2017 passed by learned Additional Collector in RTS Appeal No.60 of 2017. The learned Counsel for the respondent Mohite 1/2

523 wp8391-17 nos.2 and 3 raised preliminary objection about maintainability of the present Writ Petition. He submits that alternate efficacious remedy is available to the Petitioner. Hence, there is no substance in entertaining the present Writ Petition. At this stage, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding along with application for interim relief. To that effect, he has given in writing. Same is taken on record and marked "X" for its identification. Same is accepted.

Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2