← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2338/2019disposed off

Karan K. Gosher v. Jeetu B. Hinduja And ORS

2019-12-18Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre2 pages

(13)-CAW-2338-19.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2338 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.278 OF 2015 Karan K. Ghosher ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Jeetu B. Hinduja & Anr.

..Petitioners

Versus

Corporation Bank & Anr.

..Respondents Mr. Sidharth Samantarey a/w Vivek Phadke, Advocates for the Applicant.

Mr. Rakesh Singh i/by M. V. Kini & Co., for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATE : 18th DECEMBER, 2019 P.C.

1] The security interest being Flat Nos.6 and 9, Plot No.279, Sector No.28, Vashi, Navi Mumbai belonging to Jeetu B. Hinduja and Deepa B. Hinduja were sold at the instance of Corporation Bank and were purchased by the Applicant - Karan K. Ghosher. 2] In Writ Petition No.278 of 2015 filed by Jeetu B. Hinduja and Deepa B. Hinduja challenging the sale, a settlement was arrived at and the same has been recorded in the minutes of order dated BGP.

(13)-CAW-2338-19.doc.

06.07.2018. Based thereon the Writ Petition filed by the Hindujas was disposed of on 06.07.2018. As per the settlement, on payment of the amounts referred to therein to the auction purchaser, the sale was to be set aside and the amount of stamp duty deposited when the Sale Certificate was presented for registration became liable to be refunded. Unfortunately, the settlement records that the 2nd Respondent in the Writ Petition i.e. the Applicant would be entitled to the refund thereof from Respondent No.1. i.e. Corporation Bank. Learned counsel who drew up the minutes of the order overlooked the fact as regards the revenue, the Collector of Stamps would refund the stamp duty to the one who deposited the money for the stamp papers to be issued or electronically issued i.e. the 2nd Respondent. Learned counsel overlooked the fact that the 2nd Respondent had in fact made the application to the Collector of Stamps. Learned counsel overlooked that the Bank cannot file the application seeking refund of the stamp duty paid.

3] Thus, the instant application is disposed of directing that upon the Applicant submitting an application to the Collector of Stamps, under the strength of the present order, the Collector of Stamps shall refund the stamp duty paid by the Applicant on the Sale Certificate dated 28.03.2013.

Balaji G.

Panchal SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J CHIEF JUSTICE Balaji G. Panchal Date: 2019.12.19 14:38:05 +0530 BGP.