Swami Samarth Education Society v. Santosh Tulaji Patil And ORS.

sat wp 6526-2005.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6526 OF 2005 Swami Samarth Education Society

...Petitioner

vs.

Shri Santosh Tulaji Patil & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.Neel G. Helekar for Petitioner.

Mr.Balkrishna Joshi for Respondent No.1.

Mr.A.R. Metkari, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in WP 6526/2005 & Respondent Nos.4 to 6 in Contempt Petition No.101 of 2016. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 101 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6526 OF 2005 Santosh Tulaji Patil

...Petitioner

vs.

Swami Samarth Education Society & Ors.

...Respondents

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATE : 15 JANUARY 2020 P.C. :

Learned Counsel for the parties tender consent terms duly signed by an authorised representative of the Petitioner and Respondent No.1 and their respective Advocates. The only contesting party in the petition is Respondent No.1. The consent terms require disposal of the writ petition as also of the accompanying contempt petition in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record, marked "X" for identification. The statements and undertakings contained therein are Digitally signed by Sanskruti A.

Thakur Date:

2020.01.17 11:23:57 +0530 Sanskruti A.

Thakur accepted and the writ petition as well as the contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs. This order is passed 1 / 2

sat wp 6526-2005.doc in the presence of both parties. The Registry shall permit withdrawal of the amount in terms of Clause 4 of the consent terms. (S.C. GUPTE, J.) 2 / 2