Dada @ Pravin Babaso Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

appa.909.2016_16(1).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.909 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.522 OF 2016 Dada @ Pravin Babaso Patil ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms.Rohini Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the Applicant Mr.H.J. Dedia, APP, Respondent - State CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE: AUGUST 2, 2016 P.C.:

1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application preferred through jail. The applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 48 days caused in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence.

3.

Looking to the fact that the application has been preferred through jail and other facts and circumstances of this case, in our opinion, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned.

1 / 2

appa.909.2016_16(1).doc 4.

The application is allowed in the above terms. 5.

Fees to be paid to the appointed Counsel are quantified at Rs.2,000/-.

6.

Office to communicate this order to the petitioner who is in Kolhapur Central Prison, Kalamba, Kolhapur.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) 2 / 2