Shri.Ramharak Prasad Newoor Dhobi Alias Ramasare B. Kanojiya v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greator Bombay And ORS.

12-fa-365-2003.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2309 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1976 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.365 OF 2003 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2419 OF 2021(NOB) VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2021.10.08 17:33:20 +0530 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1267 OF 2006 (NOB) Ramharak Prasad Newoor Dhobi ...Appellant vs.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Others

...Respondents

Mr. Rajesh Kanojia i/b.Altaf Khan, for the Appellant. Ms. Tanaya Goswani, AGP, for the Respondent. No. 2. Mr. Subratho Dev i/b. M/s. N.N. Vaishnawa & Co., for Respondent No. 3 in F.A.No. 365 of 2003.

Smt. Shilpa Redkar, for the Respondent-Corporation. CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

OCTOBER 08, 2021 P.C.:

.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

First Appeal No. 1267 of 2006 is not on board. Taken on board.

3.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the limited prayer in these applications is to fi peremptory date for hearing of these appeals, pursuant to the orders passed by the Supreme Court. 4.

The appeals have been fled in the year 2003 and 2006 Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...1

12-fa-365-2003.doc respectively. The prayer in the application for fiing peremptory date for hearing of the appeals is justifable. 5.

Hence, the Interim Application Nos. 2309 of 2021 and 2419 of 2021 stand allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 6.

List the First Appeal No. 365 of 2003 along with First Appeal No. 1267 of 2006 for hearing on 17th November, 2021 (HOB). (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...2