Mayank Keshav Sahu v. Union Of India And ANR

6. BA 1846-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1846 OF 2019 Mayank Keshav Sahu ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Rijul Khandare h/f M/s Lalla & Lalla, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/b Ms. Shubhada Khot, Advocae for Respondent/NCB.

Mr. A. R. Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

FRIDAY, 22ND JANUARY 2021 P.C. :

1.

In view of the judgment referred by the Apex Court in the case of Toofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu in Criminal Appeal No. 152 of 2013, pending the aforesaid application, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid application, with liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court, on the basis of the said judgment.

2.

Application is accordingly disposed off as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

Nikita Gadgil 1/2

6. BA 1846-19.doc 3.

If a fresh application for bail is filed, the Learned Judge to decide the same on its own merits, uninfluenced of the withdrawal of this application. 4.

Application is disposed of.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Nikita Gadgil 2/2