Prathamesh Pramod More v. The State Of Maharashtra

904 ABA-1411-2019.doc BDP-SPS-TAC BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.08.04 14:04:10 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1411 OF 2019 Prathamesh Pramod More ....Applicant.

V/s The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent None for the Applicant Ms Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the Respondent/State. PSI Mr. Vijay Mohile, Park Site Police Station, present. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: AUGUST 03, 2021 P.C.:- 1] Today, none appeared for the Applicant.

2] Applicant is enjoying Ad-interim protection since last more than two years.

3] Applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime No.473 of 2018 registered on 28/12/2018 with Park Site Police Station, Vikhroli, Mumbai for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 465, 467, 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 1/2

904 ABA-1411-2019.doc 4] Allegation against the Applicant in the FIR is that the Applicant was one of the co-accused instrumental for promising room/flat to the complainant and accepted huge amount of consideration. 5] The learned APP on instructions submits that Applicant has not cooperated in the investigation. The FIR depicts that the Applicant is a recipient of the amount involved in the offence which is claimed to have been reflected in the bank statement.

6] Since there is sufficient material to infer prima facie involvement of the Applicant in the crime in question, in my opinion, no case for pre-arrest bail is made out. Application stands rejected. Consequently, interim protection stands vacated.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2