Suryakant Tukaram Deshmukh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

905.APPP617_2015.doc Vidya Amin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 617 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 655 OF 2015 Suryakant Tukaram Deshmukh ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State/respondent No. 1. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 9. CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: 21st September, 2017.

P.C.:

This Application is moved for cancellation of anticipatory bail, which was granted by this Court by the order dated 8th July, 2015 to the respondent nos. 2 to 9. All the respondents/accused are charged under sections 307, 323, 324, 143, 147, 148,149, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 135 of the Mumbai Police Act in C.R. No. 82 of 2015 registered with Karmala Police Station, Solapur. 2.

The learned counsel submitted that after obtaining pre-arrest bail, respondents have been threatening the complainant Suryakant Tukaram Deshmukh to withdraw his complaint. The learned counsel pointed out that immediately after the grant of Anticipatory Bail 1 / 2

905.APPP617_2015.doc Application, on 15th July, 2015 two NCs were registered against these accused persons dated 11th July, 2015 and 14th July, 2015.. 3.

The learned APP submitted that charge sheet is filed in this case.

4.

The alleged incident of threatening have taken place on 11th July, 2015 and 14th July, 2015. After that, Immediately this Application for cancellation of Anticipatory Bail Application was filed on 27th July, 2015. However, this Application was placed before other Judges till January, 2017. This Application was placed before me on 16th January, 2017 and thereafter on 9th February, 2017. As the charge sheet is filed, the matter is before the learned Sessions Judge. Considering the time gap, I think there is no substance in entertaining this Application. Hence, Application is rejected. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2