Rushikesh Sudhakar Chaudhari v. The State Of Maharashtra

Dusane 1/2 22 ABA 2196.21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2196 OF 2021 BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2021.10.11 19:35:49 +0530 Rushikesh Sudhakar Chaudhari ....

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ....

Respondent Mr. Karansingh B. Rajput for Applicant.

Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP for State of Maharashtra. Mr. Ashok Vijay Kotecha, complainant-in-person present Mr. R.P. Bayes, Senior PI, EOW Thane Rural Coram : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

Date : 11TH OCTOBER, 2021 P.C.:

1.

The complainant is present in the Court, who is identified by the Investigation Officer. The submissions of learned counsel for the applicant are, parties have amicably settled their dispute. His statement is not disputed. However, it is informed that subject to honouring the terms of settlement, the parties shall be moving for quashing.

Dusane 2/2 22 ABA 2196.21.doc 2.

In the aforesaid background, the application stands disposed of with liberty to move for quashing. 3.

Ad-interim is directed to be continued for ten weeks from today.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )