Gulab Namdeo Misal v. M/S. Eko Industries And ANR.

3 cal 289-11.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 289 OF 2011 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 32218 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3607 OF 1998 Shri Gulab Namdeo Misal ..Applicant v/s.

M/s. EKO Industries & Anr.

..Respondents Ms.Nivedita Deshpande i/b. S.N.Deshpande for the Applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2016 P.C.

1.

As per the office remark, the proposed legal representative of respondent no.1 has been duly served. None appears for the legal representative. There is no reply filed. In view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Accordingly, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

pps

3 cal 289-11.doc 2.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date on which the order is uploaded. After the amendment is carried out, notice of appeal be issued to the legal representative. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.) pps