A. K. Bharti And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

12 apl 873.16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2016 A. K. Bharti and ors.

.....Applicants versus State of Maharashtra and anr.

.....Respondents Ms. Ruju R. Thakker along with Mr. A. M. Sethna I/b. Mr. Pranil Sonawane, advocate for the applicants.

Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State.

Mr. Chetan S. Damre, advocate for the respondent No.2. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE : 28th AUGUST, 2018.

P. C. :

The petition is filed seeking quashment of FIR bearing CR No.102 of 2016 registered with Vimantal Police State, Pune, for the offences punishable under sections 120B, 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 342, 379, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2.

Mr. Saste, learned APP, on instructions, make a statement that the investigation into the subject FIR having been completed, "B" Summary report is already filed before the JMFC, Court No.5, Shivaji Nagar, Pune. In support of his statement, he has placed on record a communication dated 28th August, 2018 of the Police Sub-Inspector, Vimantal Police Station, Pune.

Digitally signed by Shubhada Shankar Kadam Date:

2018.08.30 10:42:11 +0530 Shubhada S Kadam 1/2 Shubhada Shankar Kadam

12 apl 873.16.doc 3.

The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 also submitted that his client has filed a protest petition and notice is already issued to the applicants.

4.

In the light of the above, the applicants' grievance, at this stage, no more survives. The criminal application is, accordingly, dismissed.

[SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2