Mayur Ramesh Kate v. State Of Maharashtra

1/2 23 ABA-2048-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

SALGAONKAR M M Date: 2022.08.06 00:03:59 +0530 SALGAONKAR M M CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2048 OF 2022 Mayur Ramesh Kate ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2572 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2048 OF 2022 Neelam Mayur Kate ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..

Respondents ...

Mr.Nikhilesh Pote with Mr.Tanmay T. Jadhav for the Applicant.

Ms.Rutuja Ambekar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr.Paresh B. Thakar for the Intervenor.

...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 04th AUGUST, 2022 P.C:- 1.

Learned A.P.P. states that the Investigating Offcer has served a notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C., but the applicant has not complied with the said notice. M.M.Salgaonkar

2/2 23 ABA-2048-22.doc Learned counsel states that the applicant shall respond to the notice by remaining present before the Investigating Offcer, who shall follow the procedure prescribed under Section 41A.

2.

In case, if the Investigating Offcer is desirous of arresting the applicant, he shall give 72 hours notice. 3.

The application is disposed off.

In view of the disposal of the application, interim application does not survive and stands disposed off. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar