Vilas Dattatray Patil And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
prod-514-wpst-20229-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.20229 OF 2017 Vilas Dattatray Patil and Ors.
...Petitioners
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh, for the Petitioners Mr. V.P. Malvankar, AGP for the Respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE :
JULY 20, 2017 P.C.:
.
Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2.
Parties through their counsel.
3.
It has been stated by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners that the question involved in this Petition has been considered and decided by the Division Bench of this Court in Kiran Namdeo Shinde and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Social Welfare Dept. and Ors. vide order dated 21.9.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.2358 of 2013 and the other connected writ petitions. He submits that this Petition may be disposed of by directing the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to consider Petitioners' grievances and take appropriate decision Vishal Parekar 1/2
prod-514-wpst-20229-2017.doc keeping in view the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Kiran Namdeo Shinde and Ors. (Supra) 4.
In view of the aforesaid limited prayer without commenting on the merits of the petition, we direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to consider and take appropriate decision on the Petitioners' grievance as expeditiously as possible by treating this petition as representation. The Petitioners may submit copy of this Petition along with a copy of this order passed today before the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
5.
Decision as aforesaid be taken by the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order as the consequential benefits if found to be entitled be also extended in their favour within the same period. 6.
C.C. as per Rules.
7.
The Petition is disposed of.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2