Ashwini Navnath Kalel v. Rahul Shivaji Kalel And ANR
1/3 nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.465 OF 2015 (Cancellation of the Bail) Ashwini Navnath Kalel ...Applicant
Versus
Rahul Shivaji Kalel and Anr.
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2015 (Cancellation of the Bail) Ashwini Navnath Kalel ...Applicant
Versus
Sagar Tanaji Dhangekar and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr.S.M.Katkar, for the Applicant in both the Applications. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Mr.S.R.Morrey i/b Mr.V.S.Talkute, for the Respondent No.1 in both the applications.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 1st AUGUST, 2017 P.C. :
1.
By these applications, the applicant (original complainant)
2/3 seeks cancellation of the bail granted to the respondents - accused, in both the applications.
2.
Learned Counsel for both the respondents-accused in both the applications submits, that trial has commenced and that more than 3 witnesses have been examined till date. He submits that there are no incidents to show, that the respondents-accused either intimidated or contacted the complainant/prosecutrix, after they were enlarged on bail. He submitted that in a similar application, being Criminal Application No.464 of 2015 filed by the complainant/prosecutrix, this Court (Coram : Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.) vide order dated 2nd February, 2017 dismissed the same, as the trial had commenced.
3.
Perused the papers, including the order dated 2nd February, 2017, passed in Criminal Application No.464 of 2015. It appears that more than 3 witnesses have been examined in the said case. 4.
Learned Counsel for the applicant is unable to show any material, that the respondents-accused after their enlargement on bail,
3/3 intimidated or contacted the complainant/prosecutrix or any other witnesses concerned with the aforesaid case. There is nothing on record to show that the respondents-accused, have in anyway, violated the terms and conditions of bail. Trial has also commenced. 5.
Considering the aforesaid, both the applications are dismissed. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)