← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/1335/2012compromisedconsent terms

Mr Anant Nilkant Sabnis.. v. Mr Rajendra Satish Sabnis

2017-07-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

905-FA1335-12.DOC Atul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1335 OF 2012 Anant Nilkant Sabnis ...Appellant

Versus

Rajendra Satish Sabnis

...Respondent

Mr Pravartak Pathak, i/b Uday P Warunjikar, for the Appellant.

Mr HT Pawar, for the Respondent.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

13th July 2017 PC:- 1.

The dispute is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. Parties are personally present in Court. The Appellant No. 1 is represented by his son, Appellant No. 2 who is also a Constituted Attorney of Appellant No. 1.

2.

I have seen the Consent Terms. They are in order. The Consent Terms are not contrary to law. I am satisfied that the parties have drawn these Consent Terms of their own volition in reflection of their true intentions. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification with today's date.

13th July 2017

905-FA1335-12.DOC 3.

The First Appeal is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms. No costs.

4.

A scanned copy will be provided by the Advocate for the Appellant. It will be uploaded as Order No. 2. 5.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (G. S. PATEL, J) 13th July 2017