Santosh Rajman Pathak v. Vimal Madanlal Jain And ANR

46-WP-3259 of 2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3259 OF 2022 Santosh Rajman Pathak

...Petitioner

Versus

Vimal Madanlal Jain And Anr.

...Respondents

....

Mr. Diwakar Dwivedi a/w S. K. Pandey, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Dilip Shinde, for Respondent No.1.

Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE :

8th SEPTEMBER, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

The Court was not inclined to entertain the Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the Petition.

3.

In view of this submission the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.

4.

The observations in paragraph No.4 of order dated 27th June, 2022 are kept open.

5.

Learned Advocate Mr. Dilip Shinde for respondent No.1 is permitted to file Vakalatnama within one week from the date of Kiran Kawre Correct version of order dated 8th September, 2022 pursuant to speaking to minutes of order dated 20th September, 2022.

46-WP-3259 of 2022.doc uploading the order.

6.

Wit Petition No.3259 of 2022 is disposed off accordingly. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) Kiran Kawre Correct version of order dated 8th September, 2022 pursuant to speaking to minutes of order dated 20th September, 2022.