R.A. Patil v. Balaso Dinkarrao Sawant

210.SA1313_2004.doc Vidya Amin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 1313 OF 2004 Dr. Ramrao Appaji Patil ... Appellant Vs.

Balaso Dinkarrao Sawant ... Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 311 OF 2017 IN S.A. NO. 1313 OF 2004 Balaso Dinkarrao Sawant ... Applicant in the matter between Dr. Ramrao Appaji Patil ... Appellant Vs.

Balaso Dinkarrao Sawant ... Respondent Mr. S.M. Kamble, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. V.C. Ghosalkar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: 5th April, 2018 P.C.:

The learned counsel for both the parties submit that the appellant and respondent are present and they want to file the consent terms.

2.

The learned counsel produced the consent terms. The parties are present. The parties along with their respective counsel signed the consent terms. The consent terms is taken on record and marked as Exhibit A. The undertaking given in the consent terms by 1 / 2

210.SA1313_2004.doc the parties is accepted.

3.

In view of the consent terms, this Court directs that in the event of any dispute in respect of access road, water and drainage pipelines or repair of the road in future, both the parties will sit together and try to solve the dispute/problems of each other, as they are neighbours. Parties shall not bring any issue or ego in between them. Parties are aware of the consent terms, so they may start the work from tomorrow.

4.

In view of the consent terms, Second Appeal is disposed of. 5.

Civil Application is also accordingly disposed of. 6.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2