Milind Manohar Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 25) aba1270-17.doc sas

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1270 OF 2017 Milind Manohar Jagtap ..Applicant.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.

Mr.S.B.Dhotre with Mr.Sandeep Agre i/b. Mr.Venkateshwar Satyanarayan for the Applicant.

Mr.S.S.Hulke, APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J.

DATED : 16 AUGUST 2017 P.C.:- This application is filed for anticipatory bail in C.R.No.73/2017 for the offence punishable under section 420, 406, 409, 468, 471, 120(B) of the IPC and section 13 of the MOFA Act registered with Sakarwada police station, Nashik. Both the sides are heard.

2.

This Court has carefully gone through the allegations

2 25) aba1270-17.doc made in the F.I.R. by the first informant. His main allegations are against Sharad Pagar and Kavita Pagar. It is his contention that false documents have been created by these persons and he was deceived. The present Applicant has today produced on record copies of transaction to show that even the transaction took place after the year 2009. The present Applicant was not involved and somebody presented himself as Applicant Jagtap and documents were shown to be executed. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that he is in no way concerned with aforesaid transactions. Learned APP admits that the Applicant was not there when the transactions were registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar. In view of the circumstances as there are no allegations against the present Applicant and as he was not present when the transactions were made and registered and / or nothing was paid to him by the informant, he is entitled to get the relief. In the result, the application is allowed. The interim bail granted earlier is hereby confirmed. (T.V.NALAWADE, J.)