Mumbai Taximens Union And ORS v. Union Of India And ORS

07-WP-9516-2022.doc Pallavi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9516 OF 2022 Mumbai Taximen's Union & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Union of India & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. G.K. S. Hegde a/w Ms. P.M. Bhansali, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 - State. Mr. S.S. Pakale a/w Mr. Kedar Dighe, Advocate for Respondent No.1 - UOI. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date:

2022.08.17 11:57:09 +0530 PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

DATE : 12TH AUGUST 2022 P.C. :

1.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that the Regional Transport Authority takes a decision with regard to allotment of parking place and the place of taxi and auto rickshaw stand. Many a times representations have been given but no decision is taken. 2.

The Petitioner may file a fresh comprehensive representation to the Competent Authority empowered to take decision with regard to the taxi and auto-rickshaw stand. In case such a representation is filed by the 1/2

07-WP-9516-2022.doc Petitioners then the Competent Authority shall take decision upon it on its own merits in accordance with law and policy expeditiously preferably within six months.

3.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) 2/2