Pramod Singh Rajput v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPTORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1296 OF 2017 Pramod Singh Rajput ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

None for the Applicant Mr. Ajay S. Patil, A.P.P for the Respondents-State PSI Ms. Gouri Jotiba Zore, from Koparkhairne Police Station, Navi Mumbai, is present CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

THURSDAY, 7 th SEPTEMBER, 2017 P.C.

1.

None for the applicant. Heard learned A.P.P. 2.

By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. I-132 of 2017 registered with the Koparkhairne Police Station, Navi Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 52, 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. 1/3

3.

Learned A.P.P, on instructions, states that the custody of the applicant is not required. He submits that the complainant, in his letter dated 20th July, 2017, has stated that the applicant's name has been wrongly mentioned in the FIR.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the custody of the applicant is not required. Application is allowed and the applicant is granted pre-arrest bail, on the following terms and conditions :

ORDER

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount ;

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station as and when called.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

2/3

7.

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, for the purpose of deciding this application. 8.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

3/3