Fatesh Mirchandani v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
ssm 1 26-appp834.18gp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 834 OF 2018 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2099 OF 2016 Shrenik Siroya .....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondent.
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 870 OF 2018 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2103 OF 2016 Fatesh Mirchandani .....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondent.
Mr. Vikas Pandey for the Applicant in APPP No. 834 of 2018. Smt. Rahila Memon I/by Amin Solkar for the Applicant in APPP No. 870 of 2018.
Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Anil Shah, Respondent party-in-person present. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 27th MARCH, 2019.
P.C.:- These are the Applications for restoration of ABA Nos. 2099 of 2016 and 2103 of 2016 respectively, which were dismissed for non-prosecution by an Order dated 4th July, 2018. 1/2
ssm 2 26-appp834.18gp.doc The present Applications are filed within the period of limitation. Sufficient cause is made out for restoration of the ABA Nos. 2099 of 2016 and 2103 of 2016 respectively. Both the Applications are allowed in the terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2