Narayan Taniya Poojary v. The State Of Maharashtra

10_aba_2012_2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2012 OF 2023 Narayan Taniya Poojary ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

...

Mr. Rupesh Maurya with Mr. Manoj Singh for the Applicant. Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent -State. Mr. Ananta Gaikwad, API, Powai Police Station, Mumbai. CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED: 1st AUGUST, 2023.

P. C. :- 1.

In the course of the hearing, learned APP has brought to my notice that in the application filed before the Sessions Court, the Applicant had claimed that he has retired from the partnership firm. The Applicant had also relied upon a retirement deed. 2.

Learned APP states that it was reported that the Applicant had in fact not retired from the partnership firm and in fact, opened an account in the Indian Bank, wherein the name of the Applicant is MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB shown as one of the partners. When this fact was brought to the MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Date: 2023.08.02 18:56:23 +0530 notice, learned counsel for the Applicant conceded that the Applicant Megha 1/2

10_aba_2012_2023.odt has not retired from the partnership firm and under instructions sought leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted. 4.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) Megha 2/2