The State Of Maharashtra v. Suraj Krushnapal Tiwari

15.ALS.93.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.______ OF 2017 The State of Maharashtra Applicant versus Suraj Krushnapal Tiwari Respondent Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for applicant-State.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE :

12th January 2018 PC :

1.

This is an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal. The respondent-accused was charged for the offence under Sections 363, 377, 506 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The prosecution is relying upon testimony of the victim. 2.

Arguable questions are raised. The appeal requires consideration and leave is required to be granted. Hence, I pass following order :

ORDER

(i) Leave granted;

(ii) An action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C may be initiated. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST