Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika And ANR. v. Klassic Tower And ANR.

caw.1857-2017 Dond

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1857 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITIION NO.7715 OF 2017 Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika ..Petitioner/applicant Vs Klassic Tower & Anr.

...Respondents

------- Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel with Pradeep Patil for M.C.G.M.- Petitioner.

Mr Milind Gyani for Respondent No.1.

Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for State.

------- CORAM: A.S. GADKARI. J.

DATE: 21 AUGUST 2017.

P.C.:

1] Heard.

2] Learned Counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed the present application and submitted that the Order purported to be challenged is dated 4th July 2016 passed by the Assistant Registrar which constitutes separate cause of action and therefore the amendment to the main petition need not be granted. I find substance in the contention of the learned Counsel for the respondents.

3] Applicant to adopt appropriate proceedings to challenge the Order dated 4.7.2016 passed by the concerned authority, if so advised. 4] Application is disposed off with aforesaid liberty. (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1