Mr. Vasant Vinayakrao Bhide v. Smt. Kamalabai Vishnu Jadhav
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2007 Vasant Vinayakrao Bhide ... Applicant SHARADA RANGNATH WAHULE V/s.
SHARADA RANGNATH WAHULE Date: 2024.02.29 11:48:38 +0530 Kamlabai Vishnu Jadhav ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2052 OF 2022 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2007 Ragini Ratnadeep Khadke & Anr.
... Applicants V/s.
Kamlabai Vishnu Jadhav Thr. C. A.
Holder Shri Dattatraya Vishnu Jadhav ... Respondent ____________________________________ Ms. Tanvi Kamat Deosthale i/by Mr. Mandar Limaye, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Mahesh R. i/by Mr. Avinash Avhad Advocate for the Respondent.
____________________________________
CORAM
: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 27 FEBRUARY 2024 P.C.:
1.
It is the case of the Applicant that earlier landlord had filed Civil Revision Application challenging the Appellate Court Judgment and decree.
2.
Ms. Deosthale submits that she is appearing for the original
applicant/ landlord and also now appearing the present applicant who have purchased the suit premises from the Petitioner. She submits that the new purchaser i.e. applicant herein, have settled the dispute with the tenant as regard the suit premises. Therefore, She has also instructions to withdraw the Civil Revision Application. Ms. Deosthale tendered a copy of Letter Dated 24 February 2024 addressed by original Applicant thereby informing the advocate appearing for the Applicant that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the Civil Revision Application. The said Letter dated 24 February 2024 is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification.
3.
Ms. Deosthale also tendered copy of Letter dated 21 February 2024 written by the new landlord addressed to the advocate on record for the Applicant thereby informing the advocate that the matter has been amicable settled and they do not wish to prosecute the Civil Revision Application.
4.
A copy of Letter dated 21 February 2024, is taken on record and marked as 'Y' for identification.
5.
Mr. Avhad, appearing for the tenant submits that he does not have any instructions from his client.
6.
Heard. I have gone through the contents of interim application, a case is made out to allow this interim application. Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The prayer clause (a) is reads as under:- (a) That the Applicants be transposed as Petitioners / Applicants in CRA No.527 of 2007 and be accordingly shown as Applicants/ Petitioners and accordingly they may be
permitted to amend the Cause Title of the CRA No.527 of 2007 accordingly.
7.
This Civil Revision Application is disposed of, has not pressed.
8.
This Interim Application if any, also disposed of. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)