Shri. Mahadev Parsharam Bajantri v. Shri. Anilkumar S/O. Laxmichand And ORS.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4221 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.138 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Applicant Present.

CORAM : AJIT N. MARE, REGISTRAR (JUDL - II) Date : 04th October, 2016 On verification of cause title of First Appeal and Civil Application with title of original proceedings, it is seen that address of Respondent No.1 is one and the same.

The Notice issued to Respondent No.1 is received unserved with remark "want of full and correct address". Respondent No.1 was Opponent No.1 before the M.A.C.T. Sangli and had furnished same address as his registered address. Hence, it is evident that Respondent No.1 cannot be served by regular mode of service.

Hence, there is no other way to serve Respondent No.1 except by way of Publication of Notice in local Newspapers as mentioned in prayer clause of Civil Application.

In view of this, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Issue Publication Notice to Respondent No.1 returnable after 8 weeks.

- sd/- Registrar (Judl.-II) dsm - R(J-II) - 04.10.16