Minabai Satish Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

wp.3038.2014_8.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3038 OF 2014 Minabai Satish Patil ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms.Rohini M. Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mrs.A.S. Pai, APP, for Respondent - State CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE: JUNE 27, 2016 P.C.:

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The petitioner preferred an application for furlough on 21.1.2014. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police report was not received, hence, her application for furlough could not be decided. 4.

The learned APP stated that thereafter the police report was received and the application of the petitioner for furlough came to be granted and she was released on furlough on 21.10.2014 for a period of 14 days.

1 / 2

wp.3038.2014_8.doc 5.

In view of the above, the petition is infructuous. Rule is discharged. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) 2 / 2