Bansode Jeevan Shivaji v. Union Public Service Commission Of India And ORS

Chitra Sonawane 9-wp-9711-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:

2022.08.26 15:13:53 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE WRIT PETITION NO.9711 OF 2022 Jeevan Shivaji Bansode ... Petitioner.

V/s.

Union Public Service Commission of India & Ors. ... Respondents ------------------- Mr.Shashikant D. Chandak, Advocate a/w Kanchan S. Chandak for the Petitioner, appointed by Legal Aid.

Mr. P. Khosla i/b Mr. R.R.Shetty, for Respondent nos.2 and 3. Dr.Vinod Joshi a/w Shivani Chandolkar, for Respondent no.1. --------------------- CORAM :S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

DATED : 20th AUGUST 2022 P.C. :

1.

In the morning session, we have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Counsel for the respondent. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is appointed through legal aid. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent raised an objection that an alternate remedy is available to the petitioner before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

3.

The matter was kept back to enable the learned Counsel for the petitioner, to take instructions from the petitioner.

Chitra Sonawane 9-wp-9711-2022.doc 4.

The matter was again called out in afternoon session. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has taken instructions from the petitioner and upon instructions, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to make an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

5.

Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

6.

All contentions of the parties are kept open. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J)