Shri Dilip G. Gokhale v. Shri Jayant Madhav Gokhale

SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2022.07.15 10:27:52 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL 3.1802.14 WP.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1802 OF 2014 SHRI DILIP G. GOKHALE ....PETITIONER V/s.

SHRI JAYANT MADHAV GOKHALE .....RESPONDENT Mr. Shailendra S. Kanetkar Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Dilip Bodake Advocate for Respondent CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

JULY 12, 2022.

P.C.:

1) Parties have compromised the issue. Power of Attorney holder of both parties are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel.

2) A joint submission is made that consent terms be taken on record which are duly executed by the Power of Attorney for the respective parties and the Petition be disposed of in terms of thereof. 3) In response to the Court's query, it is submitted that consent terms are executed as per agreement reached between the parties 1/2

3.1802.14 WP.doc and parties agree to the contents in the consent terms. 4) In view of above, Petition stands disposed of in view of consent terms which are taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] 2/2