Shri. Kolekar Babaso Appaso v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And ORS

rpa 1/2 caw-2323-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2323 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 10221 OF 2015 Kolekar Babaso Appaso .. Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents ......

Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh, Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent - State.

......

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED :

JANUARY 30, 2017.

P.C. :

Not on Board. Production of papers are allowed at 3.00 p.m.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner as also learned AGP. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, we condone the delay in filing the restoration application and for the reasons stated in the restoration application, we are satisfied that there is sufficient cause for non removal of office objection in time.

rpa 2/2 caw-2323-16.doc In the circumstances, we allow the civil application and order restoration of the writ petition to its original number. Office objection be now removed within two weeks from today. Civil application is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)