The State Of Maharashtra v. Vijay Dagadu Parulekar @ Vijya And ANR

1 909 APEAL 496-2018.doc Sequeira

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 496 OF 2018 The State of Maharashtra ... Appellant Vs.

Vijay Dagadu Parulekar @ Vijya and another ... Respondents Mrs.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for State.

CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

Date : August 23, 2018.

P.C. :

Heard learned APP appearing for the Appellant State. At the outset it is submitted that the Respondents were discharged under the provisions of M.C.O.C. Act, 1999. The matter was sent to the regular Court for trying the offences under the Indian Penal Code. The Court of Sessions tried the Sessions Case No.637 of 2015 - The State of Maharashtra Vs. Pannalal Tribhuvan Yadav @ Panna and others, all the Respondents i.e. Accused have been acquitted. On instructions he submits that in view of the subsequent judgment of acquitting the Respondents from the offences under Indian Penal Code, the present appeal has become infructuous.

2 909 APEAL 496-2018.doc 2.

The copy of the order dated 24 July 2015 is taken on record. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned APP across the bar and also the observations made in para 27 of the impugned order, we are of the opinion that no interference is called for in the impugned judgment and order. The Appeal stands dismissed.

(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( S. S. SHINDE, J.) Maria Luiza Nicholas Sequeira Date: 2018.08.28 12:12:49 +0530 Maria Luiza Nicholas Sequeira