← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3571/2019rule absolute

Vishal Sitaram Sonawane And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

2019-11-26Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari1 pages

pmw 1/1 wp-3571.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3571 OF 2019 Vishal Sitaram Sonawane and Ors.

...Petitioners

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

---- Mr. Nikhil P. Mallelwar for the Petitioners.

Mr. R.S. Khade i/b. Chetan Nagare for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Deepak Thakre, PP a/w Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent - State. ---- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 26th NOVEMBER 2019.

P.C.:

In view of additional affidavit sworn by Soumeshwari Sonawane (complainant) and no objection given by Shri R.S. Khade, we had looked into the matter. It appears that matrimonial discord has been amicably settled by parties. However, the list of ornaments to be returned to complainant was not inadvertently drawn. Petitioner No.1 and complainant have accordingly prepared that list in hand writing in Court. It is signed by them as also their respective Advocate. That list is taken on record as Exhibit - A.

In view of these developments and joint request, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)