← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/2301/2021allowed

Sangram Dadasaheb Mali v. The State Of Maharashtra

2021-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Virendrasingh Gyansingh Bisht2 pages

56-aba-2301-2021.odt REKHA PRAKASH PATIL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2301 OF 2021 REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2021.11.29 17:49:10 +0530 Sangram Dadasaheb Mali ...

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Kadam i/b Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe, for the Applicant. Smt. M.M. Deshmukh, APP, for the State-Respondent. Mr. Ketan Joshi i/b Vishwajeet V. Mohite a/w Dipak Y. Jadhav, for the intervener.

CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.

DATE : 29th November, 2021.

PC:

Vide order dated 28th September, 2021 this Court (Coram: Sarang V. Kotwal, J.) had granted ad-interim protection in favour of the applicant.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned Counsel for intervener and learned APP. Parties are also present before the Court. According to learned Counsel, the parties have settled the matter amicably and, therefore, application may be allowed. Learned APP also Rekha Patil 1/2

56-aba-2301-2021.odt has no objection to the suggestion.

I have carefully gone through the contents of FIR. Even otherwise parties were having consensual physical relationship. There is no necessity of custodial interrogation. Moreover, in view of composition arrived at between the parties, I am inclined to allow the application. Hence, the following order.

ORDER

(i) Application is allowed.

(ii) Ad-interim protection granted by this Court on 28th September, 2021 is confirmed and made absolute. (iii) Application stands disposed of accordingly. (V. G. BISHT, J.) Rekha Patil 2/2