← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8997/2017disposed off

Mrs. Nikam Pradnya Sagar And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And ANR.

2017-09-18Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 8997 of 2017 Mrs. Nikam Pradnya Sagar & Anr.

..Petitioners.

Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents.

A/WITH WRIT PETITION No. 8647 of 2017 Ms. Dubey Seema Hawaldar & Anr.

..Petitioners.

Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents.

A/WITH WRIT PETITION No. 8995 of 2017 Raju Deoji Chavan.

..Petitioner.

Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents.

A/WITH WRIT PETITION No. 8996 of 2017 Ramesh Bhau Ide.

..Petitioner.

Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents.

A/WITH WRIT PETITION No. 9527 of 2017 Sau. Lata Ramesh Taravadekar & Anr.

..Petitioners.

Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents.

1/3

A/WITH WRIT PETITION No. 9541 of 2017 Sandesh Tatya Tulsankar & Anr.

..Petitioners.

Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents.

--- Mr. Prashant Bhavake, Advocate i/by Sagar Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner(s) in W.P.Nos. 8997/2017, 8647/ 2017, 8995/2017, 8996/2017 & 9527/2017. Mr. Prashant Bhavake, Advocate i/by Mandar Bagkar, Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No. 9541/ 2017. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP a/w. Mr. A.P. Vanarase, AGP for the State.

--- CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE,JJ.

DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2017 FINAL ORDER :

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) in all these petitions makes a statement that these present writ petitions can be disposed of in the light of the order passed by the Division Bench of this court (Coram : B. R.Gavai & Riyaz I.Chagla, JJ.) dated 10th July, 2017 in writ petition no. 8587 of 2016 with connected writ petitions, as the case of these petitioners is governed and covered by the order of the said Division Bench on facts as well as on law also. The learned AGP has no objection with this position.

2/3

Therefore, as the present petitioner(s) case is similarly placed as of the case of the Petitioners in writ petition no. 8587 of 2016 with connected petitions and as observed therein in the order dated 10th July, 2017 passed by this court, we are inclined to dispose of all these present writ petitions for the same reasons.

Hence, all these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order dated 10th July, 2017 passed by this court and for the same reasons the impugned orders in the present petitions are quashed and set aside. Ordered accordingly. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) .....

3/3