Jatin Manilal Gada v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1/2 16-apl.871.2018.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.871 OF 2018 Jatin Manilal Gada ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr.O.P.Mulekar, for the Applicant.

Ms.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1 - State. Mr.Tushar Kale, for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2019 P.C. :

1.

Heard respective counsel.

2.

Respondent No.2 - Complainant is present with his Advocate. The respective counsel and complainant jointly request for quashing of FIR. An affidavit sworn by Respondent No.2 on these lines is also tendered today alleging offences under Sections 51 and 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

2/2 16-apl.871.2018.doc 3.

We have perused the affidavit.

4.

In view of the joint request made and subject to Applicant paying costs of Rs.15,000/- to the Tata Cancer Hospital, Mumbai, within three weeks from today, relief in terms of prayer clause (a) shall become absolute.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.