Manoj Tejraj Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 36-BA-1998-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1998 OF 2019 Manoj Tejraj Jain .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

• Mr. Prasannan S. Namboodiri a/w. Virendra U. Pandey, Advocate for the Applicant.

• Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 22nd JULY, 2019 P.C. :

1.

The applicant is praying that he may be released for a temporary period 30 days in connection with C.R. No.3056/2016 registered at Vartak Nagar Police Station. The investigation has resulted in NDPS Special Case No.28/2016.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant's father expired on 8/7/2019 and he sought interim bail for performing religious rituals.

Mamta Kale

2 / 2 36-BA-1998-19.odt 3.

Ld. APP points out that the final rites of 13th day are already over on 21/7/2019. Therefore, there is no necessity of allowing the applicant to get temporary bail. Hence, the prayer for temporary release on bail is rejected.

4.

There is one more prayer made in the application that the notice issued to the Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Prison, Ahmedabad be set aside. Even this prayer cannot be entertained because the notice is issued to the Jailor and he will have to explain and answer the notice. Present applicant is not concerned with the notice issued by Special Court, Thane. Proceedings are concerning Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Prison, therefore, even this prayer cannot be entertained. His other prayers are consequential prayers. In this view of the matter, application cannot be entertained and is disposed of. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)