Swagat Manik Nalawade And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

14. APL 855-2022.doc by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date:

2023.02.10 14:39:56 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 855 OF 2022 Swagat Manik Nalawade & Anr ...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Vrushali Maindad a/w Ms. Shrushti Tupe for the Applicants Mrs. P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. Mr. Shriram S. Choudhari for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

DATE : 8 th FEBRUARY, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that since charge has been framed in the said case, no interference is warranted, and as such, the aforesaid application ought not to be entertained.

Wakodikar 1/2

14. APL 855-2022.doc 2.

It is not in dispute that charge has been framed in the said case.

3.

Since the trial has commenced, we do not wish to get into the merits of the petition. The learned Judge to conduct the trial, on its own merits, in accordance with law.

4.

All contentions of all parties, on merits are kept open. 5.

The application is accordingly dismissed.

6.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar 2/2