Ibrahim Mahandsaab Inamdar And ANR. v. State Of Maharashtra

48-APL-936-2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 936 OF 2023 Ibrahim Mahandsaab Inamdar And Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr.Pratik G Tare, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for the Respondent - State. by ETHAPE DNYANESHWAR ASHOK Date:

2023.09.16 12:51:53 +0530

CORAM

:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

14th SEPTEMBER, 2023.

ETHAPE DNYANESHWAR ASHOK PC.

:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.

2.

No case is made out to interfere with the order passed by Court of Session.

3.

The Anticipatory Bail Application be decided by the Court of Session on its own merits and in accordance with law.

3.

This Court has not entered into the merits of the accusation against the applicants in the subject FIR. 4.

Application stands disposed.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) D.A.ETHAPE