Maeers Mit School Of Management Pune Throgh Its Director Dr. (Mrs.) Sayalee Gankar And ORS. v. Savitribai Phule Pune University And ORS.

by RUSHIKESH V PATIL Date:

2022.06.21 11:17:02 +0530 RUSHIKESH V PATIL 20 WP.8203.2015 AS.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8203 OF 2015 MAEER's MIT School of Management, Pune Through its Director Mrs. Sayalee Gankar & Ors. ..

Petitioners

Versus

Ms Savitribai Phule Pune University & Ors.

..

Respondents **** Mr. Surel Shah, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Anbhule, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Abhijeet Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Rui Rodrigues, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. **** CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, JJ.

DATE : 15th JUNE, 2022.

P.C:

.

The Petitioner Institution conducts the M.P.M., M.C.M., M.M.M. and M.B.S. courses. There are other management courses as detailed in Paragraph No. 4 of the petition.

2.

The University changed the nomenclature of the said Courses. The same is detailed as under:

R.V. Patil

20 WP.8203.2015 AS.doc Management Faculty Sr.

No.

Name of the Degree presently run in the Savitribai Phule Pune University Change in nomenclature of the degree as per Gazette of India published in July, 1.

M.P.M.

M.B.A. (Human Resource Development)* 2.

M.B.S.

M.M.S.* 3.

M.C.M.

M.B.A. (Information Technology)* 4.

M.M.M.

M.B.A. (Marketing Management)* 5.

B.Sc. Hospitality Studies (3 Yrs.) B.H.M. (4 Yrs.)* 3.

It was suggested by the University that the Petitioners obtained the recognition from the AICTE. The Petitioners fled the instant writ petition. Under order dated 21st August, 2015, this Court protected the admissions given to the students. The seven years have lapsed. 4.

It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners that subsequently the students have passed out and even degrees are awarded to the students by the University.

5.

As the degrees are also awarded to the students, now it would be futile to enter into the merits of the contentions of the parties. In view of that, the writ petition is disposed of, in terms of the interim order. (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) R.V. Patil