← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8001/2019disposed off

M/S. Balaji Sand Suppliers Through Prop. Shri. Popat Ganpati Mohite v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Dept. Of Forest And Land Revenue And ORS

2019-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Borde2 pages

906-wp-7999-2019.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7999 OF 2019 Shri Amar Vinayak Godbole .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra (Through Department of Forest and Land Revenue), Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors.

.. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8000 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 19894 OF 2019 Rupali Enterprises through Prop. Shri Shivaji S. Patil .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra (Through Department of Forest and Land Revenue), Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors.

.. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8001 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 19889 OF 2019 M/s. Balaji Sand Suppliers through Prop. Shri Popat Ganpati Mohite .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra (Through Department of Forest and Land Revenue), Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors.

.. Respondents Mr.Ajit M. Savagave for petitioner in above petitions. Mr.Y.S. Kochare, AGP for State in above petitions. CORAM : R. M. BORDE & Shraddha Talekar PS 1/2

906-wp-7999-2019.doc N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE : 26TH JULY 2019 P.C.

1.

The learned AGP appearing for the State, on insturctions, informs that the representations tendered by the petitioner will be dealt with and appropriate orders will be passed within a period of four months from today. The communication pursuant thereto issued by the Additional Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department to the Assistant Government Pleader, dated 25th July 2019 is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

2.

In view of the statement made by the learned AGP, we direct the respondent No.1 to take decision, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order, on consideration of merits of case. 3.

It is made clear that we have not considered merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner.

4.

The above writ petitions accordingly stand disposed of. [ N.J. JAMADAR, J. ] [ R. M. BORDE, J.] Shraddha Talekar PS 2/2