Raju @ Deepak Sarju Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtra

Tilak 1/2 (P1)APPP-643-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.643 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.509 OF 2016 Raju @ Deepak Sarju Thakur .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent --- Ms.Roshni Singh, Advocate for the applicant.

Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent State. --- CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J DATED : 10th AUGUST 2016.

--- P.C. :

Not on board. On mentioning, taken on board. Heard learned counsel for both the sides.

This application is filed for modification of condition imposed upon applicant vide order dated 8th June 2016 to furnish one surety.

From the order dated 8th June 2016, it reveals that applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one surety in like amount. Learned counsel has stated that applicant be allowed to furnish

Tilak 2/2 (P1)APPP-643-16 cash in lieu of surety or to furnish two sureties instead of one surety.

As it is stated that applicant's family members could not arrange for one surety, as aforesaid, the order is thus prayed to be modified.

Considering the facts, as aforesaid, following order is passed :

O R D E R

Applicant shall be released on bail on his executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the amount.

Rest of the conditions stands unaltered.

Application is allowed.

(P.N. DESHMUKH, J)